When it comes to car accidents, there’s an almost infinite number
of situations and varieties that come into play. There are fender-benders,
head-on collisions, T-bone accidents, flip and roll scenarios and hundreds
more. One of the most common forms of accident on the roads is the rear-end
Usually, when this happens there’s an automatic assumption that the
driver in the rear is responsible for the accident, but is this always
the case? Learn about rear-end accidents, why the rear driver is usually
held at fault, the situations where this may not be the case, and how
a car accident lawyer can help.
Negligence and the Car Accident
When two cars collide, negligence is the determining factor when seeking
compensation. Negligence, put simply, is egregious irresponsibility. It
means that whatever a person was doing or not doing, it runs counter to
the actions of a reasonable person in the same situation.
In a car accident, people who drive too fast for road conditions, who don’t
leave enough room to stop, who drive in such a way as to put others at
risk are negligent. If this negligence results in an accident with damage
and injury, the victim is entitled to compensation.
Rear-End Accidents and Negligence
One of the primary assumptions when you’re behind the wheel of a
car is that you are able to maintain control of your vehicle at all times.
This includes giving yourself enough time to stop without striking the
car in front of you. This is why, usually, when there’s a rear-end
accident, the car in the rear is held responsible. The assumption is that
the driver didn’t leave enough space or time to bring their car
under control, and that’s why the accident resulted.
When the Rear Driver Isn’t Responsible
There are, however, certain specific situations when the front driver may
be held negligent and responsible for the accident. It’s impossible
to list a set of circumstances that apply across the board, as these kinds
of situations are very individual, but a few examples include:
- A vehicle suddenly stops without warning or cause;
- The front vehicle’s brake lights are not functioning to signal a stop;
- A car experiences mechanical difficulties, a flat tire or the like and
fails to use their hazard lights or pull over to the side of the road;
- A car signals as though they are going to turn, but then stops in the
intersection and fails to complete the turn.
In these situations, it can be argued that it was in fact the lead driver
who was acting irresponsibly and is negligent and as such, at fault for
the accident. However, proving such negligence can be very tricky.
Auto Accident Attorneys
When you’re involved in a car accident, if you think the other driver
was at fault or negligent, you may be entitled to compensation for your
damages and injuries. Getting compensated, however, requires experienced
representation from a competent andqualified auto accident attorney. Only an attorney can prove negligence and make sure that you get both
justice and the compensation to which you’re entitled under the law.
If you live in Central California and experience a situation like this,
know that you aren’t alone.Call the Dunnion Law Firm today to discuss your case and get a free, no obligation consult on your
rights and ability to collect damages.