Dunnion Law Firm

The Dunnion Law Firm successfully resolved the personal injury for a husband and wife who were traveling on Friant Road, en route to Table Mountain Casino. Unfortunately, another vehicle proceeding in the opposite direction, allegedly returning from an evening of gambling, crossed over the center line striking the plaintiffs head-on. The husband sustained a cut his nose; lacerations; and a left hip injury and settled his claim for $550,000. The wife, who suffered a broken right wrist, deep laceration to right hand between thumb and fore finger and lacerations from glass, settled her claim for $200,000 as a result of a Fresno County mediation.

A 39 year old man contacted The Dunnion Law Firm after being in an accident on May 26, 2008. The insurance carrier told the man he could not have been hurt in the accident because the amount of damage to the vehicle was less than $1,00.00. The repair estimate for the damage to the vehicle was $673.05. The man had prior neck and back injuries, according to medical records. The insurance company argued the injuries sustained were not from the accident, but rather, a result of pre-existing conditions the man had at the time of the accident. Suit was filed on March 10, 2009, followed by extensive discovery including numerous depositions of the doctors and other parties involved. The insurance company hired an accident reconstructionist to investigate the accident, a biomechanical expert to argue the forces involved in the collision could not have caused injury, and a doctor to testify the injuries could not been caused as a result of the accident. The insurance carrier continued to deny

The client, a 42 year old construction worker, contacted The Dunnion Law Firm after being bitten on the right forearm by a dog owned by a long time acquaintance. The attack took place at the dog owner’s residence, which was located on property owned by the dog owner’s employer. The dog owner had no insurance and the property owner denied any responsibility, refusing to even identify the property’s insurance carrier to the client. The initial investigation by The Dunnion Law Firm showed that the property owner was responsible. This same dog had previously bitten an employee of the property owner and the property owner still allowed the dog to remain on the property. The client recovered from the injuries and returned to work doing construction without limitations. The attack did leave scars on the right forearm and the client developed an infection that required the doctor to remove an abscess to prevent further infection. All of the client’s medical bills were paid b